The Smartest Investors Club
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

The Smartest Investors Club

Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024
Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Children of undercover Russian spy couple only learned their nationality on flight to Moscow
next post
It’s official: Vice President Kamala Harris goes over the top and clinches Democratic presidential nomination

You may also like

Tesla will lay off more than 10% of...

Delta says the Olympics will cost it $100...

Spirit AeroSystems to furlough 700 workers as Boeing...

Prebiotic soda brand Olipop valued at $1.85 billion...

Maersk halts Red Sea shipping until further notice...

Tesla job cuts heighten Wall Street concerns that...

Disney drops all but free speech claim in...

Yum Brands earnings miss estimates as KFC, Pizza...

Dow closes nearly 500 points lower Thursday as...

Square outage costs small-business owners thousands in lost...

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Challenges posed by Trump and Putin push UK to adopt new NATO...

    • Lost dog returns home after swimming to island in 100-mile trip

    • Halcones Precious Metals Provides Update on Polaris Gold Project, Antofagasta Region Chile

    • Charbone Hydrogene Annonce un Financement de Reglements de Dettes par Emission d’Unites pour un Montant Total de 1,3M$

    • Charbone Hydrogen Announces Closing of Units for Debt Financing for a Total Amount of $1.3M

    Categories

    • Business (1,674)
    • Investing (5,019)
    • Politics (7,877)
    • World (6,385)
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • About us

    Disclaimer: thesmartestinvestorsclub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 thesmartestinvestorsclub.com | All Rights Reserved


    Back To Top